Promises & then/catch

What advantage does this pattern have over Promise.all()?

const promises = urls.map(url => fetch(url));
const results = [];

for (const promise of promises) {
  try {
    results.push(await promise);
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error);
  }
}

It's faster
It uses less memory
It continues despite errors
This pattern provides error isolation for parallel Promises: 1) All promises start executing simultaneously like Promise.all(), 2) Errors in one Promise don't affect others, 3) Results are collected from successful operations even if some fail, 4) Individual error handling for each Promise, 5) Maintains the original order of results, 6) Useful when partial success is acceptable.
It's more readable

Next Question (16/21)